Skip to content
CPCSTUDY COURSEMy progress

CPC STUDY COURSE · 2026 EDITION

Shared critical care without duplicate minutes

Read an original fictional chart, identify the supported facts, and explain your coding workflow.

Chart gym · Original fictional record

Service date: 2026-09-09 · Medicare facility professional service

Use your code books and write your reasoning before opening the walkthrough. This exercise contains no real patient information.

Synthetic encounter and reporting party

Fictional patient: Victor Lane, age 79. Date: September 9, 2026. Dr. Mara Kent and nurse practitioner Alex Reed work in the same critical-care group at a hospital. The professional service is reported under Original Medicare. These details and the clinical course are invented.

Critical illness and current work

The treating clinicians document acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with an imminent risk of further respiratory deterioration. They provide intensive reassessment of oxygenation and respiratory effort, manage ventilatory support and review the response. The exercise stipulates that the full clinical record supports critical-care medical necessity and the qualifying service definition.

Physician alone: 13:00–13:35

Dr. Kent provides thirty-five minutes of qualifying critical care alone, assessing the acute respiratory threat, making management decisions and reassessing response. During the counted interval, the physician’s attention is devoted to this patient; no other patient service or separately reportable procedure is included.

Nurse practitioner alone: 13:35–13:55

Alex Reed provides twenty qualifying minutes alone, monitoring the response to the agreed management, reassessing the patient and documenting the findings. The interval begins after the physician-only interval and does not overlap it.

Joint interval: 13:55–14:05

The physician and nurse practitioner then spend ten qualifying minutes together at the bedside discussing the evolving findings and the management plan. This is one elapsed ten-minute interval, not two successive intervals. Neither clinician reports another patient’s work during it.

Documentation and billing review

Both practitioners are identified in the record. Their notes preserve the solo and joint intervals, with no separately reported procedure time included. The immediate exercise asks for unique combined critical-care time. The final claim still requires review of the substantive portion, billing practitioner’s signature/date and the applicable split/shared reporting requirements; the two names alone do not complete that review.

Your coding worksheet

  1. Draw the three intervals on a time ledger.
  2. Calculate the unique combined duration.
  3. Explain why the shared interval is counted once.
  4. Identify the additional substantive-portion and documentation review needed for billing.

In your notebook, record the supported facts, your index route, the instructions you checked, and any missing detail that limits your answer.

Write your answer

Use only this fictional record. Your entries stay on this page and disappear when you leave or reload. Do not enter real patient information.

Compare with the worked explanation
  1. The unique intervals are thirty-five minutes, twenty minutes and ten shared minutes.
  2. The combined duration is sixty-five minutes.
  3. Counting the shared interval for both practitioners would inflate the same ten elapsed minutes into twenty.
  4. The unique duration alone does not complete the claim. Apply the substantive-portion, practitioner and documentation rules for the eligible service.

Reference sections: CMS Claims Processing Manual 12, 30.6.12.1 and30.6.12.5; CMS E/M Services pp.18–20

Practice the linked chart questions

Review the lesson

Sources

  1. CMS — Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 12: Physicians and Nonphysician Practitioners. 2026 service window; cited current manual sections. Accessed 2026-09-10.
  2. CMS — Evaluation and Management Services MLN006764. May 2026. Accessed 2026-09-10.

Return to the chart gym →